youthey.me.uk
SECOND SHEET paragraph 8 - 9 (law, constitution and official murder)
HOME
Helicopter Heroes
TARGETS
Ian Hislop on BBC Question Time
Ian Hislop on BBC DIANA INQUEST
Email to BBC (2007)
Celeb Big Brother Exclusive !! (2006)
*FURTHER UPDATES* (2005)
FIRST SHEET (police complaint)
SECOND SHEET paragraph 1 - 2 (intro)
SECOND SHEET paragraph 3 - 4 (secret service surveillance)
SECOND SHEET paragraph 5-6 (bent football, media, railways)
SECOND SHEET paragraph 7 (Diana)
SECOND SHEET paragraph 8 - 9 (law, constitution and official murder)
SECOND SHEET paragraph 9 - 10 (Iraq, Hutton, au revoir)
THIRD SHEET paragraph 1 -3 (once upon a time in 1960)
THIRD SHEET paragraph 4 - 5 (LISTEN to the radio)
THIRD SHEET paragraph 6 (cinema, art)
THIRD SHEET paragraph 7 - 8 (close)
The Enquiry (1)
The Enquiry (2)
The Enquiry (3)
The Enquiry (4)
The Enquiry (5)

The Burrell trial was a farce.  The Queen sitting in the back of a car with Charles suddenly 'remembers' a conversation with Burrell, and that stops a mammoth trial?  Why wasn't the Queen questioned before the trial?  What was the funny rule by which the judge could halt the trial and have discussions behind closed doors?  The whole justice system is a pompous charade.  I was always taught that the Queen was just a figurehead for the tourists and that this was a modern democracy where every citizen was equal to the Queen.  That was nonsense, wasn't it?  Why do MPs, police, armed forces and everybody swear loyalty to the Queen and not the people?  Why aren't we told the exact constitution?  You can't murder left, right and centre.  NO!  It's now obvious that the State murdered the Princess of Wales with taxpayers money.  All these people must be brought to justice.  The Queen was obviously consulted on the murder.  If the Queen were guilty of conspiracy to murder, how would the machinery cope?  Is she above the law?  WHY?  Why are all prosecutions brought in the name of the Queen?
 
    The CPS is a totally corrupt arm of the state, which is now becoming mentally deranged.  I have made them sick of life, it seems.  They don't want to send anyone to jail any more because they want me in jail!  I know it's silly!  Look at the John Leslie trial.  Worse is the Brian Stevens trial.  I'm photographing sinister stalkers in a busy public square, and I'm threatened with arrest for 'photographing young girls'; and a policeman whose credit card details the FBI passed on for accessing a paedophile website, whose laptop downloaded the images, who posed as a thirteen year old girl in an internet chatroom, who's accused of assaulting two schoolgirls, goes free?  How come an experienced paedophile detection unit is to be broken up?  How come a judge suddenly rules that police can't trap international drug traffickers by using undercover money?  Corruption in the police and the judiciary.  Did I say the country stinks?  How did the MOD find the Deepcut deaths to be suicide?  How did Surrey Police agree?  'Cover up' is too soft an expression.  These men are liars,aren't they?  Only an independent expert, commissioned by relatives, uncovered the blatantly obvious truth.  Do all crime victims have to now commission their own experts and investigators because the police are liars?  If this is how the MOD investigates their own deaths, what kind of investigation will they make of those rolls of film given for processing containing images of British troops torturing / abusing Iraqis?