|
Why did we attack Iraq? Why did we attack Afghanistan? Now we're
all at risk. Churchill first gassed the Kurds over seventy years ago. Why is he the Greatest Briton
and not Chemical Churchill? And armed by the West, Saddam Hussein gassed the Kurds fifteen years ago
- but was our ally; I would see the horrible reports on Newsnight and Panorama. Why did all the Labour Front Bench vote
against motions against Saddam Hussein at the time? Iraq is in such a run down state because of ten years
of brutally crippling sanctions. And the US needs vast quantities of oil and has none; for Saudi oil they had 30,000
troops stationed there. They're terrified that no one will sell them any because they're hated. Bomb Iraq to bits
safely from the air, get extremely lucrative contracts to rebuild it (giving none to other countries) - already a winner -
and take Iraqi oil instead of cash - brilliant! US defence contracts were already booming - already loads of backhanders
to US officials. More rebuilding contracts; more backhanders - and an enormous backhander to Bush from the
mystery Middle Eastern countries that wanted Saddam out. You need Blair onside for the war though, so? All together:
Give him a backhander! Leave the mess of Iraq now totally to the US (and UK). [Twenty-five years ago the CIA went
into liberal Afghanistan and stirred them to become fundamentalist and violent to force the Russians to try and stabilize
it all by invading; they then pumped millions into building training camps and urging Bin Laden and Muslims to become soldiers
and fight them. $51M was spent 1984 - 1994 just on 'education' programs; books teaching children to count with
pictures of tanks, missiles and landmines, and with pictures like one showing a resistance fighter with ammo belts
and a Kalashnikov over his shoulders - but his head missing - and above a Koran verse and below a Pashtu tribute to the mujaheddin
who are described as obedient to Allah: 'Such men will sacrifice their wealth and life itself to impose Islamic law
on the government.' (Former director of CIA Robert Gates in his memoirs, From the Shadows; former National
Security Advisor to President Carter Zbigniew Brzezinski in interview with French magazine Le Nouvel Observateur;
and Stephens and Ottaway of the Washington Post; From the USA, the
ABCs of jihad)]
The Hutton Enquiry is a sham. Why did he cry 'Shut that door!' to the TV cameras?
The old trick of holding a long, drawn out and tedious enquiry, and when the story's dead, a quiet verdict of 'Blame on both
sides, blah blah blah; lessons to be learnt, no deliberate wrongs, no further action'. It's completely corrupt and fixed.
Forget Hutton's verdict. We can see for ourselves. Where are the WMD? Two ice cream vans, and that's
it? A couple of 'Mind that child' signs, in Arabic, and they'll be completely harmless. Now we're told that the
45 minute claim was hearsay, and related to battlefield mortars and small ordnance?
Words fail me. Almost. The truth is that the backhander is the basic payment of the MP, not his salary or expenses.
They look on it as the basic perk that makes them do the job. The Cabinet was paid off to go to war. Full stop.
When the document that incriminated George Galloway for taking payments from Saddam was found in Iraq, nobody batted
an eyelid. That's what MPs do. The corrupt establishment looks on the public with contempt. Freemasonry
and secret societies should be declared by law in public life. Abolish the honours system. It's quite disgraceful.
Tony Blair and Jack Straw have been on the waiting list for five years to join a select dining club called Nobody's
Friends. It's ridiculous!
Two final points. 1. It will make many sick; but AIDS was engineered.
A 'final solution' to 'overpopulation, defectives and selected racial groups'. 2. The big one.
There's something that governments really should have told the public ever since the late 1940s.
|
